Skip to main content
Basket
    AO BusinessThis site is for trade customers only.Login, or call us on 01204 672 681.

    Customer Reviews - Samsung RB38C602CS9 Fridge Freezer Stainless Steel

    Customer Reviews - Samsung RB38C602CS9 Fridge Freezer Stainless Steel

    Samsung Series 5 RB38C602CS9 Fridge Freezer - Stainless Steel
    £624.17 Ex VAT
    • C Energy Rating
    • 3 Shelves (Fridge)
    • 3 Compartments (Freezer)
    • Reversible Door
    • Dimensions (cm) - H203 x W59.5 x D65.8
    4.8 / 5
    150
    29
    2
    0
    2

    Great fridge

    5/5
    So far very happy with the fridge. Plenty of space & nice to see & adjust the construction thought the app.
    Martina

    Good

    5/5
    Plenty of space inside the fridge and the energy consumption compared to my 7year old fridge is extremely noticeable.
    Alex

    Great Fridge Freezer

    5/5
    Extremely high quality Fridge Freezer, large size, beautiful finish and no frost at all in the freezer section.
    Jake

    Good size

    5/5
    Good size fridge freezer.
    Sue B

    Nice fridge freezer

    5/5
    Speedy delivery. Nice fridge freezer with plenty of space.
    DC

    My choice for my HMO’s

    5/5
    I’ve found these Samsung appliances reliable and appreciated by my tenants. They look good, are efficient and they don’t break down saving me the grief of repair. Highly recommended
    Duncan

    Okay fridge

    3/5
    Positivesw: energy efficiency, quiet, nice style, smart things comparability Negative: shelf spacing too close. Overall satisfactory
    Dan

    Ideal

    5/5
    Took few days to get used to putting foods/bottles in different places in this fridge, I followed Samsung info relating to way the cooling system works, and now really happy with it. Previous Hotpoint was 50/50 and dubious about this 70/30 but seem to have more space in this freezer and was looking forward to have more space in fridge. So nice having thinner sides and lovely and quiet. Everyone I know whose had Samsung fridge/freezers very happy with them and one reason I chose this. Wouldn’t change it now ??
    C Davison